🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States provided that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy was effective, and shared new appeals had come from intermediaries to resume discussions with the US government. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the global atomic watchdog to visit attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader asserting the locations had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an local partnership with American involvement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations resume.

The US president last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but in private Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the gathering, intended to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be ended by military means. He stated the strikes commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making faith difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Final Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently sought to enforce their desires during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and stays the final answer to settle disputes, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The facilities and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the state in the face of this assault."